Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Corona Ashcan Available

During a recent plumbing of my hard drive, I discovered an old (circa 2012) iteration of the Corona rules. After a little polishing and combining of disparate parts, I have decided to make this artifact available on both itch.io and DriveThruRPG as Pay-What-You-Want. It’s 81 pages, no art, playtested and edited, but just not what I wanted or envisioned for the final Corona product. Still, if you want to support Corona‘s continuing development, or just want a peek into how the proverbial sausage is made, this is for you.

Advertisements

New Fate tech for Corona

If you haven’t gotten your hands on Uprising: the Dystopian Universe RPG yet, it’s got some great innovations in various facets of the Fate engine (some of which I’m planning to adapt for Corona). Just from a first read-through, here are the highlights:

  • The approaches from Fate Accelerated and the four actions are replaced with means and ends (four of each). This will probably not serve Corona very well, since using the skills puts the hyper-competency of Corona‘s agents at the forefront of players’ minds. It’s an interesting twist, though, that could streamline Fate derivatives even more than FAE already does.
  • The betrayal mechanic, on the other hand, meets a design need that Corona has been looking for for years. Every character has a secret, and some of them are actively opposing the goals and actions of the others. Who is loyal to the cause, and who is an assassin, or mole, or simply self-serving?
  • Augmentations in Paris Nouveau are much more of a double-edged sword than the enhancements agents receive in Corona: they have a shorter lifespan, as well as other drawbacks. This is primarily a setting-driven detail, but an important distinction nonetheless — the Dystopian Universe wants to shine a light on the dysfunctional relationship its inhabitants have with technology, whereas Corona presumes a positive net gain to society from self-improving implants.

 

Corona, a Fate take

I’m trying out some heavy modifications to Fate to see if it works as a core system for Corona. Those modifications include:

  • adding another axis of action in the form of theaters of operation: you may act on the Personal, Tactical, Operational, or Strategic level with your skills
  • incorporating the “dark vs. light dice” mechanic from Delve: Dynamic Dungeon Adventure, wherein you roll two sets of Fate dice and, based on your choice, either retain or relinquish the narrative resolution of the action
  • including augmentations, a sub-category of stunt from the Fate Toolkit to represent things like bodily nanotech or cyberware

The results will be available for testing at Metatopia!

It’s been brought to my attention that a game called Spectrum has been released, and in the interest of not causing any confusion, I’ve renamed my open-source game system to Spectra. It’s been a dormant project for years, but I think I want to revive it, and this would head off any potential miscommunication.

The updated document is still incomplete and looking for contributors; you can access the latest edition here (https://drive.google.com/open?id=1y2WLB14sFRVsndtI0pu7VRCQdtVHi9N8)

Mulling a change to point costs in the character creation rules for G&F – the simplicity of Everway‘s approach is appealing, but I’ve been rereading Nobilis 2e for inspiration as well and I’m torn because Nobilis has a more robust ability creation method that would raise the prices on things. (In Everway, a power costs up to 3 points, or maybe 4 at the most if it’s really potent), whereas Nobilis can price some powers on a scale that goes up to something like 8 or 9 points. That would require refiguring what a point is worth in terms of character potential and how many to give a starting PC. I like games that start out with powerful characters, so I’m not averse to the idea, but I don’t want to break things by not giving the scale proper balance.

Since Everway doesn’t have a hard advancement system for characters, I’m looking at existing tech to graft onto the game that won’t disrupt the feel too much. My leaning is toward goal-based advancement such as the Motivations in Exalted or the Keys in games like Lady Blackbird.

In Everway, as I mentioned before, you have a Motive for your character: the thing that drives them. You also have a Virtue and a Fault as well as a Fate that you are expected to eventually meet. For Glorious and Fearsome, the Virtue remains the same, the Fault becomes a Vice, and the Fate becomes your Destiny. Virtue and Vice are things you’re supposed to do during play; they should come up regularly, so it stands to reason that these would map well with Keys, which serve the same purpose. One downside is that Keys are tied to an “experience point” system, which doesn’t fit the feel of either Everway or Glorious and Fearsome – characters in both games, to me, feel cheapened if their routine actions translate into an economy or currency. On the upside, these Keys also have built-in mechanical incentives, like bonuses to actions, that encourage players to stick to those personality aspects in play, which I think I’m going to keep (especially since the law of karma gets highest priority for storyguides in Glorious and Fearsome when determining the outcome of actions – much like the Amber RPG, as it has been pointed out by others elsewhere).

Destiny and Ambition, by contrast, are infrequently met, even if they are acted upon regularly. They’re epic accomplishments and events, and should be rare so that they feel special. The reward should be correspondingly special as well; Exalted handles meeting a Motivation by allowing you to increase your Essence (the game’s “power stat”) immediately provided you can afford the experience cost, and then you can choose a new Motivation that is even grander in scale to reflect your character’s broadening influence on the setting. Since Glorious and Fearsome doesn’t have a corresponding “power stat”, this would be where you would receive new Mythic Points to spend on your character, the same as during character creation. There’s no intermediary “experience point” that has to be translated into a Mythic Point, it should be noted; you get the direct reward in the form you need it. The question I’m grappling with right now is whether these two goals should be on equal footing, or whether one is more likely to come up and be fulfilled during play than the other; my instinct is to say that a Mythic must confront their Destiny when its card is drawn from the Story Deck, but since Story Deck draws are comparatively rare, who knows when that will happen? Likewise, if a Mythic can accomplish their Ambition in a handful of sessions, it probably wasn’t the best choice of Ambition to begin with, and while they will replace it with a bigger one, should that be rewarded? Things to ponder.

As I continue to read through the original Everway box, there are some areas that catch my attention now that never did before. One of those I’d like to comment on is the way wounds are handled in the game. They’re very abstract, broken into three categories – flesh wounds, serious wounds, and mortal wounds – and left, as is often the case, to GM fiat and narrative use as opposed to mechanical use. The closest the advice comes to a mechanical implementation is for players to treat serious wounds as though their hero’s element scores are all one lower than they actually are while wounded.

There are, of course, several good reasons why injuries are handled this way. Everway leans away from “blow-by-blow” resolution of combat, and thus has less need for tracking ongoing things like hit points or wound levels. You’re expected to fast-forward to the end of the combat with just a bit of flavor narration and maybe the turn of a card. But the game also de-emphasizes combat in favor of other forms of conflict resolution simply by choosing not to have a robust combat system. After all, you don’t need to know a lot about how heroes fight if you’re not going to be fighting very much, right? This is actually one of the things that attracted me to Everway in the first place, and it’s something I’m going to have to struggle with how to adapt to Glorious and Fearsome, which posits a more violent milieu than that populated by spherewalkers. Mythics explicitly draw from fable and myth, which are full of bloody deeds and the slaying of foes. Thus, I’ll have to come up with a way to balance the need for characters to take/deal wounds on a more granular level with respect for the simplicity and philosophy of the mechanical under-bed.

Right now, if just as a placeholder, I’ve recycled the penalty system I came up with for Blades of the Elf-Queen, which inflicts a cumulative -1 penalty to successive suits as your character takes hits or fails actions. It may not make the final cut, but for playtesting, we’ll see how well it functions. It seems like a good compromise on paper, at least.